| Summary: | Cross-check PPC Simple-V assembly between binutils and insndb | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Libre-SOC's first SoC | Reporter: | Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd> |
| Component: | Source Code | Assignee: | Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd> |
| Status: | CONFIRMED --- | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | libre-soc-bugs, lkcl |
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| See Also: |
https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1174 https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1173 |
||
| NLnet milestone: | new binutils | total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks: | 0 |
| budget (EUR) for this task, excluding subtasks' budget: | 0 | parent task for budget allocation: | 1259 |
| child tasks for budget allocation: | The table of payments (in EUR) for this task; TOML format: | ||
| Bug Depends on: | 1201 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Dmitry Selyutin
2023-11-05 10:53:10 GMT
Initially I was thinking to cross-check binutils/libopid/insndb. But I think I't be much better to migrate binutils to libopid, because we will never manage to keep in sync 3 subsystems. (In reply to Dmitry Selyutin from comment #1) > Initially I was thinking to cross-check binutils/libopid/insndb. But I think > I't be much better to migrate binutils to libopid, because we will never > manage to keep in sync 3 subsystems. true... but we still have to have the transition. a good workaround would be to actually use binutils as an option to the unit tests, there is now a "config" bugreport which makes this easy. bug #1174 |