| Summary: | New PowerISA Compliancy Subsets for 64-bit LE: SFS64 and SFFS64 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Libre-SOC's first SoC | Reporter: | Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake> |
| Component: | Specification | Assignee: | Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | libre-soc-isa, lkcl, programmerjake |
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 | ||
| NLnet milestone: | --- | total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks: | 0 |
| budget (EUR) for this task, excluding subtasks' budget: | 0 | parent task for budget allocation: | |
| child tasks for budget allocation: | The table of payments (in EUR) for this task; TOML format: | ||
|
Description
Jacob Lifshay
2023-11-05 20:25:32 GMT
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #0) > I have previously mentioned that I think there should be 2 new compliance > subsets: SFS64 and SFFS64 that require 64-bit LE with BE optional and they > specify the full set of instructions expected to be on any 64-bit processor > (e.g. are quadword-atomics required? what about cfuged?) this has aready been resolved, but the answer cannot be disclosed publicly as it is OPF ISA WG confidential. |