| Summary: | Draft letter to James and Mendy at OPF about WGs etc. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Libre-SOC's first SoC | Reporter: | Cole Poirier <colepoirier> |
| Component: | Specification | Assignee: | Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | blocker | CC: | libre-soc-isa |
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| NLnet milestone: | --- | total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks: | 0 |
| budget (EUR) for this task, excluding subtasks' budget: | 0 | parent task for budget allocation: | |
| child tasks for budget allocation: | The table of payments (in EUR) for this task; TOML format: | ||
|
Description
Cole Poirier
2020-09-24 00:17:07 BST
i had some outstanding enquiries to OPF and Mendy kindly replied just a couple hours ago. one of the things she said was that the compliance documents do exist (sent link) however it is up to implementors to actually come up with their own verification method. the cost of doing that is really quite enormous, and one of the attractive things about RISCV is that there exists a compliance test suite, already developed, so that no one vendor need shoulder the burden of the cost of maintaining such. thus there is no "blocker" for compliance: we "just" have to develop one (oof). |