| Summary: | Usage of LSB0 in EXTRA pseudo-code | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Libre-SOC's first SoC | Reporter: | Cesar Strauss <cestrauss> |
| Component: | Specification | Assignee: | Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl> |
| Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | libre-soc-isa |
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| NLnet milestone: | --- | total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks: | 0 |
| budget (EUR) for this task, excluding subtasks' budget: | 0 | parent task for budget allocation: | |
| child tasks for budget allocation: | The table of payments (in EUR) for this task; TOML format: | ||
| Attachments: | Proposed fixes for MSB0 issues in pseudo-code | ||
|
Description
Cesar Strauss
2021-02-15 21:21:25 GMT
Created attachment 126 [details]
Proposed fixes for MSB0 issues in pseudo-code
After a review of SVP64 register remapping documentation, I found these places where LSB0 numbering was being used in pseudo-code. OK to commit?
Comment on attachment 126 [details]
Proposed fixes for MSB0 issues in pseudo-code
ah ok in the spec? yes go for it. i will try not to cry into my tea too much. ok i'm done. commit it :)
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #2) > ah ok in the spec? yes go for it. i will try not to cry into my tea too > much. ok i'm done. commit it :) Done. |