| Summary: | clean CSV files with instructions | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Libre-SOC's first SoC | Reporter: | Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd> |
| Component: | Source Code | Assignee: | Dmitry Selyutin <ghostmansd> |
| Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
| Severity: | enhancement | CC: | libre-soc-bugs, lkcl |
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | PC | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| NLnet milestone: | --- | total budget (EUR) for completion of task and all subtasks: | 0 |
| budget (EUR) for this task, excluding subtasks' budget: | 0 | parent task for budget allocation: | |
| child tasks for budget allocation: | The table of payments (in EUR) for this task; TOML format: | ||
|
Description
Dmitry Selyutin
2022-01-09 15:54:45 GMT
(In reply to dmitry.selyutin from comment #0) > https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=550#c72 > > Problem statement, briefly: we have been using the "comment" field in > major.csv, minor_*.csv and extra.csv as a name placeholder. not quite: microwatt's *developers* use the comment field to contain the instruction name. > However, this > field comes from microwatt sources, and some fields contain stuff we don't > need. Let's clean these up. this would deviate significantly from microwatt, and would lose information that is useful to them. the reason i have left them in is so that the microwatt team could, at some point in the future, consider using the CSV files (directly). if those fields are removed, then they cannot do that. bottom line is, we can add fields, but not take them away. |